Among patients who have had an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), type 2 diabetes was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular events, but metabolic syndrome was not, according to a report published by Archives of Neurology, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
Alfred Callahan, MD, Vanderbilt University, Nashville and colleagues evaluated these risks as part of a secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction of Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Trial. The primary goal of that study was to evaluate the effect of a cholesterol-lowering statin drug (atorvastatin) on reducing the incidence of stroke in patients with a prior stroke or TIA. For this study, the authors performed a secondary analysis on the data to determine the risk of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes or MetS, and whether atorvastatin affected those risks.
In total, the study included 4,731 participants who had experienced an ischemic stroke or TIA. When enrollment began, researchers classified 794 individuals as having type 2 diabetes, 642 as having MetS and the remaining 3,295 as having neither condition. The endpoints used for this analysis were recurrence of stroke, major coronary or cardiovascular events, any CHD event and any revascularization procedure (a procedure, such as angioplasty, to open a blocked artery).
Patients with type 2 diabetes were more likely than those in the control group to experience another stroke, major cardiovascular incident, or revascularization procedure. Those in the MetS group were not at increased risk of stroke or major cardiovascular events, but were more likely than those in the control group to undergo revascularization procedures. Treatment with the statin medication did significantly reduce the risk of these events in participants with type 2 diabetes or MetS.
The authors note that their results are similar to other studies of stroke and cardiovascular events in individuals with MetS or type 2 diabetes.
“Although the possibility of variation in the benefit of statin treatment in subjects with or without type 2 diabetes or MetS cannot be excluded by this analysis, there was no evidence of a difference in treatment effect,” the authors concluded.
